After watching the speeches at the first full day of the Rupublican National Convention in Tampa, I must admit to being left more than a bit puzzled by their tone and content.
Among the early non-prime time speakers were House Speaker John Boehner who's remarks were all about all he has ever wanted to do was to "throw the President out of a bar" for his policies.
Ohio Governor John Kasich, the former GOP Congressman, FOX "commentator", and Lehman Brothers executive for seven years until that company went belly up in 2008, used his time on the podium to extoll himself about his stewardship of the state leading to the remarkable recovery in the Ohio economy over the past three years while completely ignoring the fact that it had been fueled almost exclusively by the US government funded loans that rescued the nation's auto industry which was carried out under the Obama administration without the least bit of help or support by the GOP or Gov. Kasich himself. Wow, talk about blind ingratitude.
The remarks of former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum -- the last of Mr. Romney's primary opponents to throw in the towel after being savaged by millions of dollars of super PAC negative ads secretly funded by unnamed Romney backers -- which featured a self congratulatory tone better suited to an acceptance speech which he appeared to hope to give for himself in 2016. Curiously, one of the main things he congratulated himself for in his remarks was the home schooling his children.
Pennsylvania residents will remember, however, that one of the reasons that Mr. Santorum was defeated by an overwhelming 16 point margin in his bid for reelection to the Senate in 2006 was that he had illegally used tens of thousands of dollars of taxpayer monies from his depressed "home" county in Western Pennsylvania where he did not actually live to fund that home schooling of his children all of whom lived full time with Mr. Santorum and his wife in their million plus Dollar home in Virginia, i.e., he sought and used public funds to which he was not even entitled by residence to benefit himself and his family. When caught, Mr. Santorum eventually had to reimburse the county, but this was yet another example of "do as I say, not as I do" GOP "small government hypocrisy" that Mr. Santorum and so many of his follower seen happy to practice.
Prime time network coverage of the convention began at 10 p.m. EDT with a fairly bizarre speech by Mrs. Ann Romney, much of which was about how closely she claims to relate to and identify with the struggles of "working moms," many of whom have to toil at two or more jobs just to help make ends meet for their families and put food on the table. Mrs. Romney herself, of course, has never had to do that for a single day in her life.
Completely ignored by Mrs. Romney in her curiously eldering and often finger pointing presentation, however, was any reference at all to the plight of the many millions of women who have ever had to seek assistance from government for health care, food, educational opportunity, temporary welfare assistance, child care, or anything else. They presumably are completely on their own in Romneyworld.
Mrs. Romney followed this with a fairly vacuous "just trust me" paean as to how her husband (whom she described as the son of a non college educated immigrant carpenter who had provided his son with no advantages to get him started in life) is what we in America need to prosper because he "loves" America and she "loves" him. Nothing, of course, about how he would do that other than he is a "good man" and we should therefore just "trust him" to do the right thing.
Curiously, the only specific accomplishment of her husband's in government as Governor of Massachusetts that she highlighted was the Abigail Adams Scholarship program which provides aid to needy students -- which is funded completely by taxpayer money -- in order for them to attended publicly funded state schools, i.e., a 100% government funded and operated program on both ends. She did not, of course, mention the single most successful government program enacted during his administration -- "Romenycare" -- on which President Obama's Affordable Care Act was based. Sorry, Mrs. Romney, but I was not even a little bit impressed by either of these arguments as to why your husband deserves my support to be President.
Mrs. Romney was immediately followed on stage by a mean-spirited, unsmiling "stemwinding" keynote speech by NJ Governor Chris Christie, which was 95% about (you guessed it) himself.
Mr. Christie mentioned the 2012 GOP presidential nominee just once about 18,000 words in to his 26,000 word speech which sounded, like Mr. Santorum's as if it had been written as an acceptance speech for himself to be delivered in 2016 to follow a second Obama Administration. The only government program Mr. Christie mentioned in his remarks about the evils of big government was the GI Bill which had permitted his father to be the first one in his family to go to college ... i.e. another 100% government funded program from which he and his family had greatly benefited.
After Tuesday night's presentations I wonder what Mr. Ryan has in store for us tonight. How his desired defunding of Medicare will really save it? I can hardly wait to hear how that would work.
Do you notice how Santorum talks about his grandfather and not his own parents? The reason he doesn't brag about his parent work is because they worked for the VA hospital in Butler, PA.... That's right, his parents were government employees. - Also, the Santorum's did not repay the PA school district for the funds they illegally used, I believe it was the PA Department of Education that repaid the funds. What we didn't hear from Ann, was anything about compassion. What did he do and what did he give up, if anything during her time of need with poor health issues? What we did hear from Ann was how the happiest times of their lives is when a door served as a desk and an ironing board was the dining room table. If that is the case, why so many expensive houses. Ann made a nice attempt at portraying themselves as having been just like the average middle class American family, but really think about that for a moment... wouldn't a door function as both a kitchen table (note she said dining room table) and a desk. Has the woman ever looked ant an ironing board! Christie, fact check his whoppers!
This is really a hackneyed column. For someone whose profile lists broadcaster and author, how about mixing in a little research of your own to accompany the talking points provided by MSNBC (we must have been watching at the same time when they quickly rolled out the “Abigail Adams Scholarship,” “they all talked about themselves too much,” “Christie never smiled” talking points). Your superficial description of the speeches as “bizarre” and self congratulatory, reveal your inadequacies as a commentator (objective or otherwise). Your column tries to promote a narrative that no one has anything good to say about Governor Romney, so much so that even his wife cannot say anything particularly remarkable about him. Part of the puzzling nature of the evening, which you fail to recognize, is that nights one and two of the convention had to be combined and there was bound to be some mixing of messages and loss of continuity. Regarding Ann Romney’s speech, I don’t think voters are really looking to the spouse of a candidate to make bold policy pronouncements or defend the record of their spouse’s time in office? [continued]
I’m more concerned about your general inattention to facts. Instead of questioning former Senator Santorum on a legitimate point – his statement about the President waiving the welfare work requirement is certainly worth discussing – you charge him with “illegally” using taxpayer money to home school his children. False. While the Penn Hills School District disputed the residency of the Senator’s children, and therefore whether the district should be on the hook for cyber charter payments, it was hardly illegal. Moreover, Santorum wasn’t forced to repay the district; the state returned funds to Penn Hills School District that it had withheld to pay the cyber charter. Two things are also worth noting; 1) the Penn Hills School Board member who lead the charge against the Senator was the Democratic party chairwoman for the area, and 2) the Santorums continued to home school their children after they withdrew from the charter school, thus making the statement in his speech completely valid. [continued]
Here you take Governor Christie to task for his “mean-spirited” speech that was “95% about himself.” Anyone who has read newspaper accounts or seen YouTube videos of some of the Governor’s interactions would respectfully disagree with that characterization. As for it being all about himself, I would argue that that’s what convention keynote addresses have become. I appreciate you correcting the number of words in the speech, but you should have done a little more editing. [continued]
There was a lot to discuss about last night’s speeches; I’m just sorry the reality did not match the story-line you wanted to convey. As you say, “I can hardly wait to hear” your account from tonight.
It wasn't meant to be a policy speech or an explanation of Mitt's wealth or career. It wasn't meant to be anything more than an attempt to connect the Romney's to the rest of America and show her strong love and appreciation of Mitt. I would say she did a pretty good job of that... Her's was the best of the night BY FAR!! I didn't feel Chris Christie's speech was nearly as good though.They hyped him so much,and though it was a decent speech, it surely wasn't a great one. I don't think he was a commanding presence, said anything really compelling nor was he very inspiring...not nearly what the GOP had hoped for. Today I kept hearing people saying "Christie had the whole convention on their feet"...but that was because near the end of his speech he explicitly told everyone to stand up Conventions are orchestrated stage plays, every once in awhile there is a stirring moment that transcends the normal scripted procession and becomes a memorable, sometimes even a truly stirring moment of history. Barrack Obama had one of those moments at the 2006 convention which is a large part of the reason he's President today. Maybe Ryan or Romney will have one of those moments tonight...I doubt either will be historic since neither one of them seems to be that powerful a speaker but you never know...people probably said that about Obama in 2006, I guess we'll see tonight
The Democrats will be doing their thing very soon. However, it would be poor party manners for me to make snarky comments about their speakers. Let the voters decide. I remember catching the energy of a young African American Congressman from Chicago.....who is now our President. I did not and will not vote for him but am proud of a country that makes this opportunity available. In the days ahead it is important to have good manners and civility. We are more victims of poltical apathy. The media gives us views of a wide range of opinion. It is entertaining and educational. Snarky cheap shots from the left and right are not appreciated. Mind your manners. God Bless America. And please vote!
Not exactly encouraging when he's touting his CEO skills as a reason to elect him. Did he hire these guys? Is this the same guy who said the campaign was like an etch-a-sketch after all the pandering he did in the primaries? We know he "likes to be able to fire people...", he should start with his staff!
revolting. What will you write about next week during the DNC in Chicago? Leave politics to the TV, Radio & Paper. We can turn them off.l