Although Haverford School District made AYP for 2012, Haverford High School did not. In fact, Haverford High School was among 12 high schools in Delaware County who did not make AYP for 2012.
But, Haverford Superintendent William Keilbaugh stated that Haverford High School's math and reading combined PSSA scores are actually stronger than 83 percent of Pennsylvania high schools' combined PSSA scores, according to schooldigger.com.
In addition, Haverford High School students increased their PSSA scores by 7.7 percent in math and by 4.2 percent in reading over the last two years, according to Keilbaugh. But due to the ever-increasing AYP targets, Haverford High School did not make AYP for 2012.
Since the high school is now in School Improvement 2, Haverford School District will now have to supply the Pennsylvania Department of Education with a detailed improvement plan in accordance with Pennsylvania regulations. A few steps include: reviewing IEPs of students scoring basic or below basic; identifying specific needs based on present levels of educational performance; AIMSweb and OSCAR baseline and progress monitoring data to drive instruction; and ensuring fidelity of instructional delivery of Project READ through observation and ongoing data.
"It was dressed up as accountability and making everyone put their noses to the grind stone and making sure every youngster received a proper education. Now it's clear that disguise is nothing more than a political agenda," said Keilbaugh at last Thursday's board meeting regarding the No Child Left Behind Law. "It's not about what it started out to be."
Keilbaugh stressed that PSSA scores are not the only things to look at while looking at the district. Newsweek ranked Haverford High School 31 in the state based on a number of criteria including graduation rate, AP scores and SAT scores.
School Board Members Speak Out on AYP Targets
At the last school board meeting on Oct. 4, several members of the school board voiced their concerns about the state's lofty AYP targets in which every school district must reach 100 percent proficiency in math and reading.
Here's what they had to say:
"In No Child Left Behind Law, it tells us that in 2014, 100 percent of our students need to be advanced or proficient. I think it's pretty safe to say next year and the following school year, this will be a failing school district as well as almost every other school district in the country. We have some great scores here and that's wonderful. I certainly understand the hard work of the students and staff that's gone into this. It just seems to me that there’s an inordinate amount of time, energy, resources, money going into this exercise that could be better much spent on educating our children. I know we need accountability. I know we need to measure these things. But all these tests that we've been talking about tonight have nothing to do with improving student performance. They're not improving instruction. We’re going through a political exercise where it’s an end game to say our public schools are failing and therefore privatize public education." – Lawrence Feinberg
"At some point, if you indicted everybody, nobody's a criminal. So if you show all school districts across the state fail, then it will show the system is shameless and has no validity. I think, at hand, it’s being overplayed. So when you have the western suburb districts all showing as failing, the credibility of that system is just lost." – Joseph Martin
"We also need to look at where we were years ago and I think the law has helped in certain areas. There are aspects of the law that made us look back and help children in ways that we didn't realize before. When this first came out, many of us sat here not believing that the law would still be in place in 2014, and we would ever be held to 100 percent–that someone would wake up at some point in time and say, 'this is unrealistic.' But, unfortunately, it doesn't seem to have changed. It seems to get worse." – Denis Gray, Haverford school board president
"There is an instructional value to this test. The issue is there's a time issue. I disagree that these are purely for political purposes. The politics in this and a small pea is what we're dealing with are clearly unreasonable standards. They've gotten to the point where by maintaining the standards, another dimension comes into play. If you exclude the students on IEP...the numbers say that all of our schools in every subject area, in every test and every grade level, when you focus on regular education students, we made AYP across the board. And I've said this every year, the IEP standard is an inappropriate standard. It's unfair to stigmatize this district and other school districts because it's difficult enough for regular educational students to be proficient on all levels, but it's just nonsensical for kids with IEP." – Philip Hopkins
Do you agree with these school board members? Tell us in the comments.